Brunswick b-ball barney finishes up in court

Richards went further, describing Helou as a poor witness whose evidence was vague and incomplete. She said he was “evasive and argumentative” during cross-examination.

Loading

In a lengthy statement sent to CBD, Helou said he believed this assessment of his testimony was “completely wrong”. He said he couldn’t hear properly during the hearings or understand the legal jargon, and described the final judgement as “unfair and unjust”, insisting the centre provides services for the…